Secondary metabolites and nutrient balance in casuarinas: An insight into Protein Competition Model (PCM)

  • Natchiappan Senthilkumar Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Forest Campus, R.S. Puram, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India.
  • Sourimuthu Murugesan Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Forest Campus, R.S. Puram, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India.
  • Devaraj Suresh Babu Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Forest Campus, R.S. Puram, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India.
Keywords: Secondary metabolites, nutrient balance, Casuarinas, Protein Competition model

Abstract

The total phenolics, total condensed tannins (TCT), nitrogen (N) and total protein (TP) in needles of Casuarina equisetifolia and Casuarina junghuhniana were studied to understand the carbon-nutrient balance (CNB) and the growth-differentiation balance (GDB) hypotheses. The carbon-nutrient balance (CNB) hypothesis postulates that phenolic levels in plants are determined by the balance between carbon and nutrient availability1. The growth-differentiation balance (GDB) hypothesis2 considers factors that limit growth and differentiation. The production of phenolics dominates when factors other than photosynthate supply are suboptimal for growth (e.g., under nutrient limitation). Resource-based theories assume that the synthesis of defensive compounds is constrained by the external availability of resources and internal trade-offs in resource allocation between growth and defense. It is stated that growth processes dominate over the production of defensive compounds and that more carbon is left for defensive compounds only when plant growth is restricted by a lack of mineral nutrient (emphasized by the CNB hypothesis) or by any factor (according to the GDB hypothesis). Jones and Hartley3 presented a protein competition model (PCM) for predicting total phenolics allocation and content in leaves of higher plants. Protein competition model (PCM) stated that “protein and phenolics synthesis compete for the common, limiting resource phenylalanine,” so nitrogen (N) rather than C is the limiting resource for synthesis of phenolics. In our study, the contents of Total Phenolics, and Total Condensed Tannin (TCT) in needles of C. equisetifolia were higher than the C. junghuhniana. However, Total protein and nitrogen (N) contents were higher in C. junghuhniana than C. equisetifolia. There was a significant negative correlation between Total phenolics, TCT and Total Protein, N contents. Therefore, it is found from the present investigation that C. equisetifolia follows CNB hypothesis. However, C. junghuhniana follows GDB hypothesis, since it contains low defense chemicals viz., phenolics & TCT and high nitrogen and protein contents. Hence, the adaptability of C. equisetifolia in coastal areas and C. junghuhniana in drier inland condition is realized.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1]. Bryant, J.P., Chapin, F.S., and Klein, D.R. (1983). Carbon/Nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos, 40(3):357–368.
[2]. Herms, D.A. and Mattson, W.J. (1992). The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 67(3):283–335.
[3]. Jones, C.G. and Hartley, S.E. (1999). A protein competition model of phenolic allocation. Oikos, 86(1):27–44.
[4]. Feeny, P. (1970). Seasonal changes in oak leaf tannins and nutrients as a cause of spring feeding by winter moth caterpillars. Ecology, 51(4):565–581.
[5]. Gayler, S., Grams, T.E.E., Heller, W., Treutter, D. and Priesack, E. (2007). A dynamical model of environmental effects on allocation to carbon-based secondary compounds in juvenile trees. Annals of Botany, 101(8):1089–1098.
[6]. Asquith, T.N. and Butler, L.G. (1986). Interactions of condensed tannins with selected proteins. Phytochemistry, 25(7):1591–1593.
[7]. Hagerman, A.E. (2002). Tannin Chemistry. (Available from: http://www.users. muohio.edu/hagermae/tannin.pdf)
[8]. Lin, Y.M., Liu, J.W., Xiang, P., Lin, P., Ye, G.F., da Sternberg, L.S.L. (2006). Tannin dynamics of propagules and leaves of Kandelia candel and Bruguiera gymnorrhiza in the Jiulong River Estuary, Fujian, China. Biogeochemistry, 78(3):343–359.
[9]. Graham, H.D. (1992). Stabilization of the Prussian blue color in the determination of polyphenols. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 40(5):801–805.
[10]. Mae, T., Makino, A. and Ohira, K. (1983). Changes in the amounts of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase synthesized and degraded during the lifespan of rice leaf (Oryza sativa L.). Plant and Cell Physiology, 24(6):1079–1086.
[11]. Tuomi, J. (1992). Toward integration of plant defense theories. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 7(11):365–367.
[12]. Riipi, M., Ossipov, V., Lempa, K., Haukioja, E., Koricheva, J., Ossipova, S. and Pihlaja, K. (2002). Seasonal changes in birch leaf chemistry: are there trade-offs between leaf growth and accumulation of phenolics? Oecologia, 130(3):380–390.
[13]. Hättenschwiler, S., Vitousek, P.M. (2000). The role of polyphenols in terrestrial ecosystem nutrient cycling. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 15(6):238–243.
[14]. Haukioja, E., Ossipov, V., Koricheva, J., Honkanen, T., Larsson, S. and Lempa, K. (1998). Biosynthetic origin of carbon-based secondary compounds: cause of variable responses of woody plants to fertilization? Chemoecology, 8(3):133–139.
[15]. Salminen, J.P., Ossipov, V., Haukioja, E. and Pihlaja, K. (2001). Seasonal variation in the content of hydrolysable tannins in leaves of Betula pubescens. Phytochemistry, 57(1):15–22.
[16]. Kleiner, K.W, Raffa, K.F. and Dickson, R.E. (1999). Partitioning of 14C-labeled photosynthate to allelochemicals and primary metabolites in source and sink leaves of aspen: evidence for secondary metabolite turnover. Oecologia, 119(3):408–418.
[17]. Koricheva, J. (1999). Interpreting phenotypic variation in plant allelochemistry: problems with the use of concentrations. Oecologia, 119(4):467–473.
[18]. Lambers, H., Chapin, F.S. and Pons, T.L. (1998). Plant Physiological Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
[19]. Horner, J.D., Cates, R.G. and Gosz, J.R. (1987). Tannin, nitrogen, and cell wall composition of green vs. senescent Douglas-fir foliage: Within- and between-stand differences in stands of unequal density. Oecologia, 72(4):515–519.
[20]. Mansfield, J.L., Curtis, P.S., Zak, D.R. and Pregitzer, K.S. (1999). Genotypic variation for condensed tannin production in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides, Salicaceae) under elevated CO2 and in high- and low-fertility soil. American Journal of Botany, 86(8):1154–1159.
[21]. Kraus, T.E.C., Dahlgren, R.A. and Zasoski, R.J. (2003). Tannins in nutrient dynamics of forest ecosystems—a review. Plant and Soil, 256(1):41–66.
[22]. Kuiters, A.T. (1990). Role of phenolic substances from decomposing forest litter in plant-soil interactions. Acta Botanica Neerlandica, 39(4):329–348.
[23]. Kraus, T.E.C., Zasoski, R.J. and Dahlgren, RA. (2004). Fertility and pH effects on polyphenol and condensed tannin concentrations in foliage and roots. Plant and Soil, 262(1-2):95–109.
Published
2014-10-01
How to Cite
Senthilkumar, N., Murugesan, S., & Babu, D. (2014). Secondary metabolites and nutrient balance in casuarinas: An insight into Protein Competition Model (PCM). Journal of Advanced Laboratory Research in Biology, 5(4), 107-111. Retrieved from https://e-journal.sospublication.co.in/index.php/jalrb/article/view/201
Section
Articles